DADT, The
House Hearing |
|
After an epic 17 year
battle, Congress authorized the repeal of the
discriminatory Don't Ask Don't Tell law last
December. In a grand signing ceremony just
before Christmas, President Obama put his
signature to the legislation in an auditorium
filled with those who had fought for their
country and for an end to the prejudicial
policy. In an historical understatement,
the President put down the final pen and said,
"This is done!"
The procedure that
followed was in place, prepared over a yearlong
period of study and planning by the Pentagon to
implement the transition to open service by
patriotic lesbian and gay volunteers. Back
at the beginning of last year, during Senate
Armed Services Committee hearings, several
service chiefs had expressed strong reservations
about even considering such a change.
These were the top generals and admirals who had
spent their lives dedicated to serving our
nation with the utmost professionalism and
courage. They did not hesitate to assure
Congress that, if ordered to do so, they could
and would implement the change. These
military leaders do not hesitate. They
know what "can do" means. They have
done exactly what they said they would do; with
leadership and determination, they have now
nearly completed one of the largest training
programs in the history of our armed forces.
As the British Royal services did over a decade
ago, they competed to get the job done rapidly
and best, in the spirit of readiness.
There are some in
Congress, however, who have never served and
have no concept of our military tradition of
patriotic loyalty and ability to move forward
with any task ordered from winning WWII to
integrating and implementing diversity in our
armed forces. And so, on April 7th of this
year, 2011, the House Armed Services Committee
belatedly held a hearing on 'oversight' of the
repeal implementation process. The service
chiefs were asked to testify before the
committee and answer questions. From the
opening remarks of the of the committee
members who had called the hearing, and the tone
of the questions, it was clear that they
expected that the service chiefs would express
the same reservations and or opposition to
allowing open gay service in our armed forces as
they did early in 2010 at the Senate Armed
Services Committee hearings. They didn’t.
The Commandant of the
Marine Corps was the most forthright in
righteously stating that the elite Marines are
completing the transition better and quicker
than any other service. When asked about
resistance among those serving combat zones, he
said that he had had direct interaction with
Marines in Afghanistan and they indicated that
they were focused on battling the enemy and were
unconcerned about serving alongside those they
have already been serving with.
In response to questions
about the necessity of new rules regarding
disruptive conduct by gay service members in the
close confines of combat and submarines, The
chiefs clearly stated that the sexual
orientation of their service members was
irrelevant; no new rules have been needed in
that the rules of conduct apply to all.
The service chiefs stated that the key to the
ongoing success was leadership, starting with
themselves, in instructing troops on the next
step in diversity in our armed forces.
The hearing was not going
at all the way House opponents of repeal had
hoped. About a week earlier, they had
inquired about the cost of the repeal
implementation training, perhaps thinking that
they could somehow cut off the funding and
thereby prevent progress. It turned out
that it is likely costing less than the
taxpayer's money which was wasted on the hearing
itself.
Frustrated, a House
opponent of DADT repeal rudely suggested that
the service chief's current testimony might be
disingenuous due to their being within the chain
of command, despite their previous testimony to
the Senate last year. The ignorance of
this insult to the integrity of our service
chiefs, and all of our patriotic service
members, is breathtaking. Those of us who
have proudly served know and understand that our
service chiefs meant exactly what they said when
they testified that they expect nothing less
than getting the job done right.
--------------------------------------
“I want to be
clear to all Marines, we will step out smartly
to faithfully implement this new law. It's
important that we value the diversity of
background, culture and skills that all Marines
bring to the service of our nation." -
General James Amos, Commandant of the Marine
Corps
"We are
confident that you are up to task, and that we
can implement this change in policy by relying
on the leadership, professionalism, discipline
and respect for each other that have
characterized our service for the past 235 years
and remain at the core of the United States
Army." - General George Casey, Army Chief of
Staff
“Combat effectiveness is
what we provide as a Navy. And repeal will
neither change who we are nor what we do. The
time is right, the time is now, and we will lead
a prompt and thoughtful implementation." -
Admiral Gary Roughead, Chief of Naval Operations
“I know our Airmen will approach this
issue professionally, and will continue to
adhere faithfully to our core values of
integrity, service before self, and excellence
in all we do. Implementing this change while
fighting a war is challenging, but I have no
doubt that the Air Force will do this in a way
that minimizes operational impact and
successfully accomplishes the important task of
training our force." - General Norton Schwartz,
Air Force Chief of Staff
“The repeal is
the right thing to do; our shipmates will no
longer be forced to hide or even lie about their
sexual orientation...As the Commandant and I have
said in the past, we do not harbor the slightest
doubt that the men and women of the Coast Guard
are up to the task of implementing the change
associated with this repeal.” - Vice Admiral
Sally Brice-O’Hara, Vice Commandant of the Coast
Guard