LT Dan Choi
Discharged
Under
DADT |
|
July 22, 2010
This morning I
received notification of my honorable discharge from
the army under "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." After 11
years since beginning my journey at West Point and
after 17 months of serving openly as an infantry
officer this is both an infuriating and painful
announcement.
But my service continues. To all those veterans who
have endured similar trials and injustices or
prematurely ended their military service because of
the unjust policy: our fight has only begun.
The true honor and dignity of service does not come
from a piece of paper, a pension or paycheck, a rank
or status; only an unflinching commitment to improve
the lives of others can determine the nature of
one's service. From the first moment we put on our
nation's uniform and swore our solemn oath, we
committed ourselves to fight for freedom and
justice; to defend our constitution and put the
needs of others before our own. This is not an oath
that I intend to abandon. Doing so at such a time,
or remaining silent when our family and community
members are fired or punished for who they truly are
would be an unequivocal moral dereliction that
tarnishes the honor of the uniform and insults the
meaning of America.
Lt. Dan Choi |
Interview
with LT Dan Choi
July 22, 2010
by Denny Meyer
I'm old enough and fortunate
enough to have, in my lifetime, known both Leonard
Matlovich and Dan Choi. They both have been
able to inspire those around them with their shear
courage and dedication to freedom. The
question is, what motivated them to risk their
military careers, what inspired them? One
immediately thinks of the word "sacrifice."
But, as Dan Choi explains in this interview, he sees
his actions as his "Duty." While clearly, on
this day, he expresses great frustration with both the lack of progress and particularly with
those lacking his undaunted commitment; he remains
determined to carry on with what he sees as his
duty, our duty, to speak out and demand equality.
Times have changed. Back in
the mid 1970s and early 1980s, Leonard Matovich was
essentially unemployable after having been
Discharged for being a self-proclaimed
homosexual. Although he was regularly in
demand to give speeches and lead parades, he earned
his living as a used car salesman during the years
that his case proceeded through the courts.
Today, 35 years later, Dan Choi, Honorably
Discharged due to being a self-proclaimed
homosexual, could go to work for the State
Department, other federal agencies, or as a civilian
contractor to the military as an Arab linguist.
Whatever he ultimately chooses to do, he represents
an heroic triumph of truth.
Gay Military Signal: Dan, you
are a true hero! But, even heroes have
feelings. In your published statement (above)
today about receiving notice of your discharge due
to DADT, you speak inspiringly about the meaning and
purpose of what you are doing; but what of your
personal reaction and feeling on this day?
Dan Choi: As much as you
prepare, you can never be a hundred percent
comfortable with a discharge notification because
your emotions bring back the entire time of your
service. You remember from the moment you
raised your right hand; you think about your
parents; the day you first put on your uniform;
running and doing PT, calling cadence; being shipped
off to war; going to all the schools, all your
friends; and -for me- coming out and what it meant.
It all just comes back in that one singular moment
that is defined by a piece of paper that says,
"You're fired." So, that piece of paper encapsulates the entire huge
emotional roller coaster. Obviously, there is
the feeling of honor about what you've accomplished;
and the feeling of honor from all the people who
have supported my journey, who have been there with
me getting arrested on the (White House) fence, or
speaking out on my behalf whether as individuals or
a part of organizations. Everybody who has
spoken out, I feel, has been on this journey
together with all of us. They understand what
this all means; what being kicked out means, what
the risk and consequences were. But, its
difficult, when you think about all of that (at this
particular moment).
GMS: What does it mean to you?
Dan Choi: It means, number
one, undeniably, that we live in a time of rampant
discrimination; I'm just one person getting kicked
out. I've been serving openly for over 17
months in an infantry unit. I have the
qualifications of an Arabic linguist and a
translator; but my job is as an infantry officer.
I went through all of the schools at Ft. Benning, I
went through my time as a Platoon Leader, I was
deployed as an infantryman on patrols; and I'm still
an infantryman. When we go to training, we are
in the WWII barracks with open showers, when we
drill every month, or ship out to qualify on our
weapons, or practicing battle drills or military
operations in urban terrain and mountain training.
It's all standard infantry training; and when we come
back we shower. And we are naked in the
shower. And nobody has quit; nobody has
protested; nobody has hate-crimed me; nobody has
given me dirty looks. We joke together, people
ask me questions about transgender people and
marriage equality; they have questions because many
don't know any other gay people. But, others
have come up to me and said, I want you to know that my
brother is gay or my cousin is gay. Some of my
soldiers educate "me" about gay culture because they
know a parent or someone else. One of my peers
told me who Rufus Wainright was. What it all
means is that even with going to drill as an openly
gay person, my soldiers come up to me and salute and
say, "We respect you more because you told the
truth; and if we were going to go to Afghanistan or
Iraq, I'd want to serve with someone honest, who is
not hiding."
I think there are a lot of gay
veterans who have a backwards view of what service
means; tying themselves up with the sentiment and
emotional impact of the uniform, the flag, and apple
pie. That is not what service is about, and to
claim ownership of all that is theft. I think
that service is always purely and primarily about
protecting our country, fighting for freedom and
justice, and putting the good of others before
yourself. It's not about the symbols. It's
not about how it gives you a feeling when you tear
up; those are emotions. And that's not what it
means to serve. It's un-American to say that
service just equals our emotional reaction.
Service is something very sacred, very honorable,
and very dignified that formed in our society and
our history for a reason. We don't serve
anybody if we just say, the uniform and flag mean
this to me. That's not patriotic; patriotic
means you serve and sacrifice by putting others
before yourself. Patriotic means you sometimes
break those regulations that are immoral and
unjustifiable in relation to our American way of
life.
The way I understand the
Constitution and my oath to defend the Constitution
is to defend it against enemies foreign and
domestic. In Iraq we were told we were there
to protect our Constitution. And when I come
home, the oath doesn't end. We have a solemn
obligation and responsibility to defend our
constitution and its meaning. Our constitution
is under attack in its meaning, in its purpose, and
written law. When you have regulations that
say, "Do not tell the truth, do not have integrity;
you cannot access your own truth, you are not
allowed to acknowledge to people that you love, you
are not allowed to get married," if you die in
Iraq or Afghanistan your partner will not be
notified—those things are contrary to what our
country means, what our culture and Constitution
mean about respecting our troops, and supporting
our ideals about family and marriage and love.
For me, that's what this
journey has been all about. It means a lot
more than whether or not I get a pension or achieve
a certain rank. In a lot of ways, rank and
pension and symbols and sentiment work contrary to
our goal. I found, in this past year and a
half, that a lot of gay veterans can never "step up"
and contribute by coming out and being a part of
this movement by making the world a better place.
They are trapped. At this point I feel that to
not speak out is a dereliction of you duty to future
generations. Silence is not a moral
neutrality; it is the vehicle that perpetuates
discrimination. Silence creates a culture that
is contrary to what we know (as our duty) is
correct. Leadership in social movements
properly involves creating a legacy that improves
the lives of others.
We as veterans have got to
stop tolerating excuses such as, "Well, I can't come
out; I'm not allowed to come out," even though I
understand their legal perspective. I'm an
infantry officer. People in my unit have been
to combat multiple times. When I came out in
this unit's environment, we didn't just talk about
"Don't Ask Don't Tell;" we didn't just talk about
national security, or about speaking Arabic.
We talked about love and boyfriends and girlfriends,
transgender people,—we talk about "all" of those
people whom we are really fighting to protect.
If you are afraid to bring any of that up because
you fear that it might not be palatable "at this
time," my message to those who feel that way while
at the same time saying, "I'm a tough (expletive),"
I say to them, "You are the epitome of cowardice."
If you cannot stand up for those who are most
marginalized in our society, because it may not be
palatable to do so, your silence is a
dereliction of moral duty and mission. It's a
deep shame for the sake of political efficacy, when
we are fighting for justice. The bottom line
is, there is no such thing as, "I can't come out."
I've proved that you can come out.
GMS: What struck me, in
looking at your discharge notice, was the phrase,
"due to saying that you are a homosexual;" and
imagining how that will be seen say 80 years from
now when people will be incredulous at the
backwardness of attitudes back at the turn of this
century. What do you think will be the future
historical context of that document.
Dan Choi: It's not my goal to
be historical. Its purpose would be to educate
those of future generations. So I think it's
beautiful that Leonard Matlovich put pink triangles
on his gravestone. Because it hearkens back to
our history, and reminds us that there are lessons
to be learned; and we have not yet come to where we
need to go. Leonard Matlovich died without
seeing the ban on open service lifted; he died
without seeing gay people being able to get married;
he died (of AIDS) without hearing the President
utter the word AIDS. There is so much that
still needs to happen. As we die, we leave
things for other people to remember. The thing that
I want for people to remember is that the uniform
stands for fighting for freedom and justice; and if you
do not fight for those sacred American promises,
then you don't deserve to wear the uniform.
The uniform has been used to bring about justice and
freedom from the time of the American Revolution.
People have told me that "the use of this symbol of
America in your civil disobedience is treacherous
and wrong and rude and is like burning the flag."
Yet from the beginning of our country there were
those who seemed to be willing to trample sentiment
with heavy feet, and what was important and what
mattered was not
sentiment but where those feet were going.
What mattered was the direction in which we were
headed. For officers, today, to forget that is
a shame.