August 15,
2006
Sgt
Denny's Rant
The Military Rainbow Community
One
thing I've learned in nearly 60 years of walking
the Earth is that people are very fussy about
words and phrases. I've got one friend with
whom I may never use the word
"should." That sets him off,
"Should!? You Democrats are always telling
people what they 'should' do!" By the
time I get through reminding him that he's a
Democrat, I've forgotten what I was talking about
in the first place. These days everything is
a coded euphemism full of implied meaning.
'Red' used to mean Communist, socialist, left
leaning, and even anti-American. Now, it
means Republican; now how the hell did that
happen?!
Its
almost impossible to come up with a
representational unitary slogan without somebody
objecting to its presumed implied meaning.
Several years ago, while forming the New York
Chapter of American Veterans For Equal Rights, we
worked at naming the chapter. I was quite
enthused with the idea of calling it the Walt
Whitman Chapter after the Northeastern gay poet
who rhapsodized the American soldier, until a
woman veteran at the meeting muttered,
"another white male..." Oy
vey. We finally settled on AVERNY, safe if
not inspiring. These days, 'identity
politics' is fraught with steaming dialogue about
inclusiveness and implied exclusion. There
is the organization with the wonderfully
alliterative name: OUTPOCPAC (OUT People of Color
Political Action Committee). People of Color
carefully covers a wide spectrum of racial
ethnicity, while still stating the group's focus on
endorsing minority candidates. While it is
profoundly politically incorrect and often illegal
for community and public groups to exclude folks
of the basis of sex, race, or ethnicity, it is
generally acceptable by reason of righting wrongs
for hyphenated American groups to have a specific
racial or ethnic affinity in their name and
purpose. In our movement for
minority sexual orientation and gender identity
rights, great care and consideration is given to
being as inclusive as possible in slogans and
organizational names.
In
our particular movement to repeal the Don't Ask
Don't Tell law so that patriotic American
volunteers may serve openly in our armed forces
regardless of sexual orientation, there is
additional concern that our supporters and
advocates be included in our image of a coalition
of groups and individuals, straight and gay,
active military and veterans, legislators,
activists, advocates and others all working
together towards a common goal. The
challenge is in having a slogan that can make all
feel positive and proud about their involvement in
advocating for our rights. I have found
straight elected officials to be proud to be
photographed with their arm around me beside a
rainbow flag.
When
I was on duty, I wore
my uniforms with pride and, if anything, I was
just a tad more neat and tidy than those around
me. That was not because I was fashion
queen; it was because part of my job as a sergeant
was setting an example in my appearance. My
uniforms no longer fit, I'm almost 60 and portly. When
I go to seek support for our rights, I wear a suit
and proudly wear pins that identify me as American
and as a veteran who is gay. I've learned to
carry extras of the gay insignia. Its the
first thing they ask for.
We call this 'zine 'the
voice of the military rainbow community.'
That includes supporters and all who are serving
or served who take pride in their support the right of patriotic
Americans to volunteer to serve in our armed
forces regardless of sexual orientation.
Gilbert Baker, the creator of the Rainbow flag and
a US Army Medic Vietnam Veteran, said that
'nature' was the inspiration for his creation of
the Rainbow flag. He said that he sees the
rainbow as a symbol of our diversity and as a tool
of our visibility. He said that our symbols
are what we project onto them as he did with
nature's natural rainbow. Hence, 'the voice
of the military rainbow community is intended as a
representation of our diversity, unity, and pride
in our common goal of achieving equality in our
armed forces.
|